Ahjamu Umi's: "The Truth Challenge"
  • Home
  • Workshops
  • New Manifesto
  • Hit Me Up
  • Blog
  • Coming Events
  • Videos
  • Donations

What is Meant by the Term "Bougie" & Where Did It Come From?

6/27/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
I cannot say regarding non-African communities, but in African environments all over the world, practices that are deemed to reflect an elitist philosophical foundation are labeled as "bougie."  People who act in a way to appear as if they believe they are better than others are labeled as bougie.  I recall that my father, who was a proud working class African man, used to call any African that he thought was behaving in a way to endear themselves to white society a "bougie a - -  n - - - - r!"  

To the point about my father, the term bougie has evolved into a popular cultural phenomenon all within itself.  Everything from nice expensive things to attitudes that suggest a hint of a superiority complex are labeled as bougie.  My father and the people who generally use the phrase probably never think about it beyond its popular usage, but the common way in which the word is used sheds light on its actual meaning and what people are saying when they use it.

Of course, the term bougie derives from the classical term bourgeois or bourgeoisie which are terms most commonly credited to the writing of economist Karl Marx in the 1800s.  Marx provided us with a manuscript diagram of class structure in society.  The basis of his analysis was the working class people (we Pan-Africanists would of course add the peasantry to that category) who whether industrial or service, provide the foundation of any society.  From Marx's correct perspective, the people who dominate, exploit, and control the working classes are the bourgeoisie who are the spokespersons for the elite classes who own and control the means of production e.g. the resources we depend upon to live, develop, and sustain ourselves.  From Marx's perspective, his analysis of class structure was based strictly on material conditions.  In other words, materialism is the only driving force for class structure.  As African revolutionaries, we take the best that any culture has and we compliment it with the many advances our own culture has contributed.  So, we accept Marx's analysis of class, but we change the conditions to reflect our African reality.  We recognize the role of the peasantry, a segment Marx practically never discussed.  And, we also add in the contributions of Kwame Nkrumah, Sekou Ture and others.  It was Nkrumah who argued that ideology, along with materialism, are factors that must be considered in any class analysis.  Nkrumah answered the question about how someone who has nothing, like a houseless person, could identify with the class interests of the bourgeoisie despite clear proof that their material conditions do not coincide.  That houseless person is ideologically committed to the worldview of the bourgeoisie class and often, as Nkrumah cited, people who are ideologically committed will do more to advance the practical objectives of the bourgeoisie than the bourgeoisie themselves.

The above analysis by Nkrumah is important to understand in order to properly digest the method in which African people use "bougie" today.  Culturally speaking, as Nkrumah articulated, African people use the term bougie, not just in the material sense of how your class position interacts with the power structure, but with an ideological perspective of how you behave.  In fact, I would argue that Africans use the term primarily in an ideological sense.  When my father called other Africans "bougie" he was always referencing people who lived in the same working class environment that we did.  These people he was labeling were never actually a part of the bourgeoisie class in any material sense.  They were people who were as poor as we were, but who acted as if they were better than us.  By calling them bougie, my dad was making the point that those people were acting like house slaves.  He was making a class distinction between between himself, who he saw as a solid representative of the working class - a rebellious field slave - and any African who he perceived to be desiring to be connected to the established leadership in this country.

So, the term bougie has never been viewed as a positive within our communities.  House slaves are not commodities people are raised to strive to achieve.  Despite the efforts by popular capitalist culture, like television shows and movies, to minimize and diminish the hard class statement someone makes when they call you bougie, its still not viewed as a positive.  

I'm proud to say that no one has ever called me bougie although I've used that label for many Africans and other people.  I consider never being called bougie a badge of honor.  I would like to preserve the class basis of that statement. I  wish to honor my father and other people's work who never read a book by Marx or Nkrumah in their lives, but who clearly understood that the interests of the ruling classes of this system, and theirs, could never be the same.  And, that those of us who mimic our masters, will always be the enemies of humanity.  So, the next time someone uses the word "bougie" think about the class components that are actually driving that analysis and how you fit into that picture.

​
1 Comment
Le Raun Warner
6/30/2019 12:41:46 pm

Good Article.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    I don't see disagreement as a negative because I understand that Frederick Douglass was correct when he said "there is no progress without struggle."  Our brains are muscles.  Just like any other muscle in our body if we don't stress it and push it, the brain will not improve.  Or, as a bumper sticker I saw once put it, "If you can't change your mind, how do you know it's there?"

    Archives

    June 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly