Ahjamu Umi's: "The Truth Challenge"
  • Home
  • Workshops
  • New Manifesto
  • Hit Me Up
  • Blog
  • Coming Events
  • Videos
  • Donations

John Lewis, Kwame Ture, Bill Clinton & Illusions of Progress

7/30/2020

5 Comments

 
Picture
Kwame Ture, then Stokely Carmichael, having an organizing conversation with a local resident in Loundes County, Alabama, in 1965. That next year, Kwame would defeat John Lewis and become chair of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee which signaled the organization's evolution towards more militant politics. Those politics laid the groundwork for much of what is happening today i.e. Black Lives Matter.
U.S. Congressperson and former civil rights activist/organizer John Lewis was laid to rest today.  His service took place at the historic Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.  The ministerial home of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the 50s and 60s, Ebenezer has a long history with African people’s struggle for freedom and justice.  That’s why its surreal that we find ourselves in a place today where someone like Bill Clinton can be welcomed into the pulpit at Ebenezer to offer an opinion on the correct path African people must take to achieve our forward progress.  Clinton, of course, was the 42nd president of the U.S. empire.  His claim to fame while being president was fooling scores of Africans into believing that he was our friend.  It wasn’t until Obama was elected in 2008 that some African people stopped referring to Clinton as “our first Black president.”  Underneath the superficial character presentation of Clinton existed a politician who built, along with his wife and many other opportunists a colossal industry based on imprisoning African people in this country.  The Omnibus Crime bill, passed during Clinton’s tenure in 1994, proliferated incarceration rates, primarily of poor and African and/or Indigenous peoples, at record rates.  And, yet, despite that clear legacy of harm caused against our people, we still invite someone like this to speak in one of our most storied and respected churches.

As a result, it should come as no surprise that Clinton used his opportunity to honor Lewis by taking a swipe at the legacy of Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael).  Ture, was the organizer within the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) who unseated Lewis as chairperson of SNCC in 1966, thus signaling SNCC’s turn towards much more militant politics.  In Clinton’s words, this nation is in such a better place because Lewis refused to continue within SNCC after “Stokely.” 

Of course, the position advanced by Clinton should surprise no one who has studied the history of this man.  And, it was ironic that Clinton reminisced during his Lewis speech about “being with Jesse Jackson” because it was Jackson who was at the center of one of Clinton’s first clear indications of what type of snake he really was.  During his 1992 presidential campaign against George H.W. Bush (the first Bush president), Clinton used a traditional Southern Strategy race baiting tactic to call out Jesse Jackson, who at that time was considered one of the leading civil rights leaders in the U.S.  Clinton did this by making a public reference to Jackson having some type of political comradery with then so-called “Blacktivist”, rapper, Sista Souljah who had made a name for herself by calling out white supremacy in uncompromising terms.  Clinton, in a direct appeal to bourgeoisie voters, primarily European ones, attacked Jackson at that time as pandering to racist African militancy. 

In some ways, what Clinton said today about Kwame Ture is a continuation of those politics of respectability and accommodation.  That the only right way we could ever advance our struggle for justice is by adopting positions that did not challenge the very existence of the power structure.  Instead, the “responsible” way to struggle is always that of waiting, being patient, and working within the very system that keeps us oppressed.  Clinton’s comments were opportunistic and designed to send a message to our people at a time when the very foundation of this system is being questioned in many ways.  Clinton’s message?  Don’t stray too far away from the master.  Stay within this system and you will be rewarded.  Resist, and you will be punished.  It would be hard to find much fundamental difference between what Clinton said today and what Trump says every-day.  Plus, its highly doubtful that Lewis himself would have agreed with the characterization that Clinton gave regarding SNCC’s direction in 1966.  Now, I doubt there is even 2% of what Lewis believed that I agree with, but one thing I do know is that even after an initial period of distance after that 1966 election, Lewis evolved to a place where he eventually had a positive relationship with Kwame Ture.  He even came and participated directly in the dinner honoring Kwame’s life shortly before Kwame made his own physical transition back in 1997. 

The bourgeoisie are the spokespersons for the international capitalist/Imperialist network which is led by the U.S.  And, Clinton is undoubtedly a member of the bourgeoisie class.  Every U.S. president is a member of this class, including Obama.  Their roles after leaving the presidential office are to continue to advance the values of capitalism, which cannot happen without also advancing white supremacy, patriarchy, homophobia, and all the forms of injustice that capitalism thrives on.  Obama does this routinely as does Clinton.  Its their class responsibility.  The bigger problem is that so many of us have no understanding of history, and no desire to have an understanding, that when these people distort our history, we don’t have the tools to effectively push back.  For example, if someone was to say, as Clinton did today, that SNCC, under Kwame Ture’s leadership (and later Jamil Abdullah al-Amin, formally H. Rap Brown, and then Phil Hutchings), went downhill and Lewis left to preserve some level of dignity while those wild Africans ran the organization into the ground, it would be necessary for you to have the proper understanding of SNCC history to place Clinton’s comments in the garbage can where they belong.  You can do that by understanding what happened to SNCC after Kwame became the chairperson of the organization.  What happened is the launching of the most recent Black power movement.  The bourgeoisie want you to define that era in the late sixties by the hundreds of urban rebellions, but we employ you not to back down from that challenge.  Even Dr. King knew that urban rebellions are the voice of the voiceless.  In other words, when people are in pain, they lash out.  When a child touches a hot stove, they don’t start singing a song and playing.  Urban rebellions are reflections of this system’s inability or desire to change oppressive conditions, so people lash out.  If people don’t want people lashing out, care more about people unjustly losing their lives than you do about property being attacked as a result of this glaring human contradiction.  Besides that, what SNCC actually accomplished through the Black power movement was a mass awakening that we as a people have the right to exist in a manner consistent with our values and culture, regardless of how European society feels or thinks about it.  Without that movement, there would be no Black Lives Matter movement.  There would probably be no LGBTQ movement or women’s movements.  No physically challenged movement.  All of those evolved as a result of the Black power movement.  And, that developing consciousness led to SNCC taking a revolutionary position against the Vietnam war.  In fact, as quiet as its kept, it was SNCC that led the smash the draft movement.  They were the ones who popularized the saying “hell no, we won’t go!” (a Kwame classic), and they were the first national organization at the time (with respect to the Nation of Islam) to take a national position against zionism and in support of the Palestinian people.  Clearly, all of those things have advanced and evolved to become mainstream elements of the social movements you are seeing in action today and none of this could be happening without the contributions of the more militant SNCC, led in party by Kwame Ture.  So, clearly, there was no moral imperative to part “from Stokely” as Clinton implied in his boring and absurd comments earlier today. 
​
As was stated, Clinton is an enemy to African people and all of oppressed humanity.  Anyone who occupies that seat in the White House has no choice except to be that because their job is upholding capitalism which is the enemy of all of humanity.  So, despite the fact that we are the direct political descendants of Kwame Ture, we are not enraged by Clinton’s comments disparaging Kwame today.  We expect no less from the bourgeoisie, any of them.  What we wish to see happen is for you to start to take seriously this need to get organized.  To stop naively believing you can compete with this system by reading one book every once and a while and getting on social media and expressing opinions when the need arises.  Our progress requires constant organization backed by constant political education.  The way that demon can get on television and propagate lies about our history, we need to be able to engage our people with constant and correct political education.  I’m not upset at Clinton.  Demons do as demons do.  I’m wondering when we can grow to the level of moving past reacting to demons like him.
5 Comments

Guns W/O Political Eduation is Like a Journey W/O Direction

7/25/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture
Africans (Black people) everywhere are expressing joy and support for the presence of this Not F – - king Around Coalition (NFAC).  If you don’t know, they are the coalition of armed Africans who have gathered hundreds of armed Africans, mostly men identifying folks, to display weapons and demonstrate symbolic resistance against white supremacy.

The idea is understandable.  Five hundred plus years of African people being terrorized systemically all over the world would certainly generate a strong desire on behalf of our people to strike out against the terror we experience.  So, the concept is perfectly valid.  The only question/concern is what the proper response actually is to address our oppression?

The answer to that last question can only be answered one of two ways.  Either we desire to engage in performative actions that make us feel better about the oppression we experience every-day.  Or, we want to figure out how to eliminate this suffering once and for all.

The challenge of this internet/social media based reality we live with today, is we all function under the illusion that just because all of us have the same accounts, a computer, and an ability to voice a perspective, it has become normalized for people to believe all opinions matter.  Or, just because someone has the ability to express an opinion in a post, meme, video, etc., that constitutes a perspective where its value is gauged not on the quality of the information within it, but the form in which the perspective is presented.  In other words, form always supersedes essence.  If something looks good, it will get more likes and attention than something with much more substance that doesn’t appeal to us the same way.

As a result, most Africans, and most people overall, are choosing symbolic actions that make us feel better over actual work to eliminate the oppression.  The European woman in Portland, Oregon, U.S. stripping naked and standing/sitting in front of terrorist police makes some of us feel better because for that moment, the police left.  Of course, the gestapo terrorists came back with a vengeance the very next night, probably further infuriated that they couldn’t terrorize as they wanted the night before.  This reality hasn’t stopped scores of primarily European observers from praising this individual act.  This symbolic act as if it represents some tangible victory.  This is the surreal reality we face when we know not one less African has been brutalized by state sanctioned terrorists anywhere on earth as a result of that woman showing her genitals to those terrorists.
By the same token, these Africans come out in the thousands with these guns.  There is no clear plan or idea about how the guns will be used.  And, as someone who has lots of experience handling firearms, I was more than a little squeamish, watching the video of the action today, about how careless many of the armed participants were in handling their weapons (and that was before there were reports of gunshots at the action).

Still, more than a few Africans and other good hearted people were jumping to the ceiling at the sight of these armed Africans as if this symbolic action was going to intimidate one gestapo cop or white supremacist from their plans to terrorize any of us.  In fact, the videos from today’s events show glimpses of the white right militia members of the Three Percenters present at the NFAC action.  I’m speaking as an activist/organizer who has stood up against the Three Percenters on multiple occasions.  If those Africans permitted those clear white supremacists (their name depicts their racist interpretation of the history of how this country was formed) to rub shoulders with them armed, that’s nothing we should feel any comfort and strength from. 

There should be absolutely no question that guns, no matter how many of them, without organized political education guiding the usage and existence of the guns, is never a good formula.  Guns without political education, like the title says; is like a journey that has absolutely no direction.  We like the guns and the imagery because it symbolizes us having the power to defend our lives, but as was demonstrated when the shots rang out earlier today, the police – the same gestapos we are in the streets protesting in the first place – were able to instantly take control of the day, despite the presence of all of those Africans with guns.  If nothing else, that should show you how its performative and not anything designed to build capacity and strength for our liberation because if it was, we could never surrender our authority to the same gestapos who are killing us.

The final conclusion for us has to be that even if we have a militia of 10,000 people, even 50,000, while the overwhelming majority of our people are not even involved in any organization, that represents no real strength for the masses of our people.  Instead, it has the potential to be a detriment to our forward progress.  Our history is full of examples of para-military groups with no political education and clearly this has not worked out well for us.  In Azania (South Africa), we had the Inkatha Movement in the 80s which was mobilized by the racist apartheid regime to use its massive military strength to work against the African National Congress, the Pan-Africanist Congress of Azania, the Black Consciousness Movement, the Azanian People’s Organization, and all the anti-apartheid forces operating there.  This was possible because of the lack of political education which caused people who rallied around Inkatha to believe the talking points that the anti-apartheid organizations mentioned were fronts for outside “communist agitators.”  In the same vein, the U.S. government was able to manipulate the lack of political maturity within our Black power organizations to easily facilitate violence between the Black Panther Party and the US Organization in which a number of Panthers, including Alprentice “Bunchy” Carter and John Huggins were killed on the UCLA campus in 1969.  There are volumes written by those who lived through those experiences expressing dismay at the toxic masculinity, patriarchy, and the use of guns without the level of organization to ensure the masses are being organized to confront the state to seize power (the only logical reason weapons should ever exist for us).
​
Until we get people engaged with organizations, the guns are useless you all.  We realize that Mao Tse Tung said “power grows out of the barrel of the gun” but his statement should be viewed in the context of mass organization which his Communist Party in China certainly demonstrated. Without the organized masses – which requires people in organizations – we can’t do anything with guns above just attempting theater to make us feel better about the system continuing to dominant our lives.  At least the good news is simple.  Join some organization working for justice and if you don’t see an organization you feel you can join, start one.  And make sure your organization has a strong political education process.  Once those components are in place, you can add community defense projects that help you train with weapons, but all of that work should always be couched in political education context.  Once we recognize this, we can really begin getting to work towards liberation.

1 Comment

Don't Be Fooled by Tricks from the Power Structure

7/14/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture
As it relates to the ongoing protracted struggle for human rights and justice, the masses of people have spent the last several weeks hitting the streets in numbers that haven’t been seen for decades.  From Africa to Europe to Asia to the Americas, millions are demanding justice.  These calls have focused attention on systemic oppression against African and Indigenous peoples in the U.S. as well as other countries like Australia, Canada, etc. 

The significance of the U.S. in this equation is connected to its position as the most powerful and economically advantageous country in human history.  Also, because it has used its vast resources to craft a very carefully created, and mythical image of itself as the world’s leader in peace, justice, and equal rights for all.  All one has to do to confirm this is listen to newly processed immigrants from anywhere and they will gladly tell you how grateful they are to be here and how wonderful this country is.  Right alongside that crowd are the folks who’s perception of every single element of life is viewed through an individualistic philosophy.  Meaning, if its happening to them directly, its valid.  If its not something they can see with the naked eye, then it isn’t based in reality. 

The problem with these groups of pro-capitalist/U.S. people is that you would have a better chance of pushing a camel through the eye of a needle than you would have of finding one of these folks who have any type of comprehensive understanding of why, how, and where oppression is built and maintained on the backs of large segments of these capitalist societies.  And, much of the reason this analysis is so absent is because of the capitalist system’s remarkable ability to reframe and reshape social phenomenon in its desired fashion.

Examples abound, but lets use the recent protests for example.  These international showcases of disgust at state sanctioned terror and murder against African people reflected a cross section of people coming out to express their demand for justice.  Since police only know one method of communication, control and force, of course they often did the only thing they know how to do, unleash violence on peaceful protesters.  Its always universally true that oppression breeds resistance so the people elevated in response to these terrorist attacks and numerous cities across the globe saw peaceful resistance transition to angry expressions aimed at the state.

What’s interesting is the capitalist system’s clever response to this.  Police departments everywhere were encouraged, probably even ordered in many instances, to engage socially with protesters.  This explains why the very same stone-faced state terrorists who gas bombed you yesterday were out there today dancing, kneeling, and seemingly expressing solidarity with your righteous anger against the very system they are out there protecting.  Corporations began to display signs everywhere utilizing the slogans of today i.e. “Black Lives Matter!”  I even saw one business, that has a reputation among African people for being systemically racist against us, with a mural of George Floyd with the words: “We see your suffering.  We feel your Pain.  We stand with you!  Black Lives Matter!”  Despite the obvious contradiction that “Black Lives Matter” only seem to matter to businesses like this as a tactic to hopefully persuade the masses to not set that place on fire, most people seem to be satisfied with this level of hypocrisy.

Writing Black Lives Matter on streets.  Netflix, HULU, etc., displaying more African themed content in the last month than they have displayed in the last 10 years.  Governments pledging to defund police (which really means just redirecting money and using police facsimiles instead).  Governments and corporations pledging not to use racist symbolism, or support racist statues, etc.  All of these things represent the basic compromises capitalism is always willing to make because none of those things cost them more than pennies and none of that does a single thing to transform this backward system one inch away from its racist, systemic, and institutional practices. 

Still, voices everywhere are viewing these developments as “progress” although during the time all of these things are happening, police are still continuing to harass, terrorize, and murder African and Indigenous peoples.  Racist and patriarchal realities are causing women, especially Trans women, to be murdered at record levels with hardly a peep from the government that said it was okay to write “Black Lives Matter” on the street.  And, even a novice student of cointelpro knows that the very same government that says write that slogan on the streets is the very same government that is doing everything it can behind the scenes to criminalize protesters and discredit the movement for social justice.

It’s the equivalent of a community of chickens catching a fox in the hen house.  The fox, concerned about his safety in the midst of all these angry chickens, agrees to engage in a series of reforms that offer nothing beyond symbolism of safety to the chickens.  Meanwhile, at night, while the chickens are lured to relax and sleep by the foxe’s symbolic gestures, the fox picks them off one at a time.  As the chickens awake, to find another of their kind gone, they are met by gestures of condolences and support from the very same fox who is causing their demise. 
​
There’s a ton of performance art happening right now posing as legitimate movement work.  There’s also an even greater amount of performance art posing as genuine commitment by the power structure to concrete social change.  All of this is an illusion because the true social change we all need can never happen until there is an organized and serious movement committed to destroying capitalism and replacing it with a socialist reality that places people over profits.  Until we are ready to confront that inescapable reality, the best we will be able to accomplish is to enjoy the performances.
1 Comment

Symbolism & African (Black) Men (Mostly) With Guns

7/6/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture
 The video was circulating endlessly this past weekend.  Seemingly dozens of primarily African men (with a sprinkling of women) carrying semi-automatic weapons, marching, and chanting, in formation.  Apparently, headed for the Ku Klux Klan headquarters in rural Georgia, U.S.  It wasn’t clear what happened once or if they reached their destination, but its safe to say that the centuries old vision of African people putting the Klan out of their misery once and for all didn’t take place.
For the most part, the reaction, primarily from colonized people, particularly African women, was support for this action.  And, for people who have been consistently and brutally assaulted by white supremacists for centuries, its certainly understandable that a symbolic gesture of us fighting back would generate feelings of joy.  The vision of African people with guns is clearly a bold symbol of our desire to be free.  And, as someone who has been around weapons my entire life, and who has organized resistance during numerous confrontations with white supremacists who were armed, I understand the rationale better than most who are talking about it.  The difference is I’ve never in my life been in a political situation, confrontation or not, where myself or anyone I was with displayed weapons of any kind publicly.  And, I never will do that.  The reason for this is I was trained by the elders that the absolute only time a firearm is presented in public is the time that firearm is used, period.  In other words, when that gun comes out, somebody’s getting shot with it.  I was taught that the best usage of a firearm is the element of surprise and once you walk around with it publicly, that advantage is eliminated.  The logic around this has always made sense to me and as a result, I’ve always honored that practice. 

Also, there’s the political analysis around guns that has be had whenever the issue of guns, the state, and oppression/repression surfaces.  Most of the models of African gun toting actions in the U.S. today evolves clearly from the work of the Loundes County Freedom Organization in Alabama, U.S. in 1965, better known as the original Black Panther Party initially organized as an armed party with the symbol of the Black Panther that was organized by Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).  And, or course, the work of the Black Panther Party of self-defense, organized in Oakland, California, U.S., the next year – 1966 – by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale.  For most people, it started with the Oakland Panthers and their police patrols where they wore black leather jackets, tams, and openly carried weapons to patrol against police terrorism against our people.  In fact, most of the Africans marching today even visibly present themselves like the Oakland Black Panther Party.  One of the main groups behind Saturday’s action is even called the Huey P. Newton Gun Club. 

Since much of the present action is inspired by the Black Panther Party, it makes sense to evaluate the Panthers of the 60s and the guns they carried.  Let’s be absolutely clear when we say that we can never be accused of being anti-gun.  We are revolutionaries so to suggest that means you know nothing about revolution in general, and you certainly no nothing about our work to protect our people.  Armed struggle is an unquestionable element of any genuine revolutionary struggle, but the most critical element of revolutionary struggle is always the political education that guides the usage of weapons on all levels.  Much has been written about the Black Panther Party and how the guns often overshadowed the political education.  Actually, Huey P. Newton, shortly before his death, spoke directly to this.  While being interviewed for the Public Broadcasting System’s “Eyes on the Prize” documentary, Newton said too many of the people who joined the Panthers during their height of membership were drawn “to the guns and the berets” and not the essence of the Panther’s very reason for existing i.e. to organize the African masses for revolutionary change, or at least concrete grassroots changes. 

Its that last part that causes concern about the marching with guns today.  The action is great from a symbolic level.  We are promoting fighting fire with fire, but beyond the symbolism, us not being willing to organize an actual reality where we are focused, trained, and committed to the type of protracted struggle that surrounds any armed movement for justice means the marching with guns is simply  performative art with limited value. 

The Ku Klux Klan is a terrorist organization.  They have a 150 year history of brutally and systemically terrorizing us.  It won’t take them very long to overcome any anxiety, if any actually exists, about us showing up in front of them with guns.  No, the only way those actions will have any long term effectiveness and meaning is when we organize capacity to march right in the Klan’s house and clean house.  We don’t have that capacity now, despite hundreds of us showing up with guns, or else we would have not only done that to the Klan in Georgia, but to the Klan, neo-nazis, police, and military everywhere.  And, if you are thinking we don’t have the ability to do that, then you are a major part of the problem.  Organization decides everything and for some of us, symbolism is no longer enough.  We want action to resolve these problems impacting our people.  And, that takes long term organization, not the mobilization of a one day action.  Most of us simply do not possess the commitment and discipline to do the level of consistent work needed to build that capacity mentioned previously.  For most of us today, symbolism is all we are looking for and this is proven by the fact most of us are not even involved on any level with any type of organization working for our people.  Besides, I would argue that a bunch of mostly dudes, even African dudes with guns, doesn’t make a lot of African women, especially our LGBTQ people/sisters, feel any safer.  Patriarchy and guns have a long history supporting one another.  Again, the solution for that is organized political education.

Baba Seku Neblett is a former SNCC Freedom Singer.  He’s also a former Black Panther Party Field Marshall.  And, currently, he’s an All African People’s Revolutionary Party cadre member living in Ghana.  In the documentary film “Kwame Nkrumah – Black Star of Africa” Baba Seku gave us a perfect example to illustrate the point this article is attempting to make.  In that film Baba Seku said that when he, Kwame Ture, and other former Panthers descended upon Guinea-Conakry in 1968/69, Kwame Nkrumah, who was forced into Guinea because of the illegal coup backed by the U.S. to overthrow his government, was there serving as their guide to carry on the African revolution.  One day, frustrated with Nkrumah’s dictate that they spend their time studying, Baba Seku, Kwame, and others stormed into Nkrumah’s Vila Syli residence armed, declaring their readiness to take on the forces in Ghana who had overthrown Nkrumah’s government.  Baba Seku relays how Nkrumah looked at all of them, shook his head, and slowly began taking their guns from them and handing them books instead.  Nkrumah was clearly a very wise and venerable revolutionary by the time the fight against international imperialism took him to Guinea.  His experience attempting to organize support for, while mentoring, Patrice Lumumba and his National Congolese Movement in the Congo in 1960/61, taught Nkrumah about the insidiousness of neo-colonialism and capitalist oppression against our people.  His experience with the Central Intelligence Agency overseeing the illegal overthrow of his government and his subsequent experiences with similar actions cemented Nkrumah’s understanding.  What we need is a steeled political cadre who understand the forces oppressing us on a worldwide basis and who can develop the capacity to organize our people, including on a military level, to seize power from the forces causing our oppression. 

No one is criticizing our brave family members who displayed those arms.  We just want so much more than a symbolic action.  We organize daily for more.  We understand that for those who are not directly involved in our struggle, symbolism seems like actual change, but it isn’t.  What we want is for all of us to realize this and make the commitment to get involved so we can build capacity to go beyond symbolism and towards building actual power for the African masses. 
​
As much as we wish to feel better about our oppression.  As much as we want those hurting us to understand we are tired of it.  Symbolism only delays what we really need from happening.  If we continue to only be willing to demonstrate symbolism against a system that has no problem committing genocide against us, we will never improve our conditions.  We will only feel a little better about our suffering.  A few hundred of us armed while most of us are not even involved in our liberation struggle is idealism and despite the great intentions by those last weekend, it will do little to stop our oppression.  I don’t know about you, but I’m not interested in feeling better.  I’m only interested in the power of the organized masses.  I’m interested in building the blocks to take our enemies down, once and for all and that’s going to require a lot more than a few of us with guns, no matter how good we look.

1 Comment

    Picture

    Author

    I don't see disagreement as a negative because I understand that Frederick Douglass was correct when he said "there is no progress without struggle."  Our brains are muscles.  Just like any other muscle in our body if we don't stress it and push it, the brain will not improve.  Or, as a bumper sticker I saw once put it, "If you can't change your mind, how do you know it's there?"

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    June 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly