We all know that none of us are perfect. We all have aspects of our history that we prefer no one know anything about. This is of course more of an issue if you are a public figure, especially in this 24/7 media world we live in today because nothing you do is going to escape documentation and the subsequent scrutiny. That being said, I want to talk about the dishonest and cowardly approach being taken by the enemies of African liberation (who can be any nationality/race) to try and defame our heroes and heroines by attempting to constantly bring up issues in their lives that may be deemed controversial or inappropriate by some people today. An example is the effort some of these scrum are making to depit Malcolm X as gay because of his admitted (in his autobiography) association with an older White gentleman during his pre-awakening as the powerful revolutionary African nationalist that we identify him as today. Another example is the attempt to portray Huey P. Newton as a drug addict because of his struggle with crack cocaine during the latter years of his life and his apparent murder at the hands of a drug dealer some claim he was attempting to rob. This portrayal of brother Huey is an attempt to discredit his founding of the Black Panther Party in Oakland. Finally, the effort to create this narrative about Ernesto "Che" Guevara that suggests that he begged for his life at the time he was captured and murdered in Bolivia and that he was captured in the first place due to his being betrayed by Fidel Castro and the leaders of the Cuban Revolution where Che started his political life. It's not my attempt to explain or discuss any homosexual activity by Malcolm or any drug activity by Huey. It's also not my intention to even validate the accusations against Che. Starting with Che, his courage is unquestionable and anyone who suggests Castro betrayed him is just parroting the imperialist line because they have no real information about the history of Che's struggle in Bolivia. With Macolm and Huey, their personal actions occurred before and after their rise to political leadership and participation so it makes no sense to suggest in any way that those activities would even be relevant to their political lives. I understand the focus of our enemies is to suggest that these actions serve as proof of some sort of lack of integrity by these great brothers, but all one has to do is just examine the courage displayed by both brother Malcolm and Huey, the commitment required, and the sacrifice endured by each and any suggestion questioning their credibility during their political lives is absurd. Especially since the scum who level those accusations can't provide you one minute of activity on their part that reflects even a toenail's worth of courage as it relates to achieving African forward progress that those two displayed on a regular basis. Finally......Isn't it funny that these same vemon who level those baseless charges are never just as apt to point out the contradictions of the so-called "founding fathers" whose transgressions, unlike those of Malcolm, Huey, and Che, are personal and questionably even moral issues. I'm talking about George scurvy carrying, Washington....George S.T.D. Washington. The first president who owned at least 65 Africans as personal property. How the hell can he be any founding father when he practiced genocide against Africans? The same with Thomas Jefferson who fathered African children from an African slave woman. He is revered as some sort of statesman when he denied fatherhood of his African child and refused to initially provide any support for the upbringing of the child. This is the resume of a lowlife scumball....Not someone who deserves respect and the reverence reserved for those thugs some of you call leaders. Still, we never hear you explain or even acknowledge and address these issues? We never hear you talk about George W. Bush who was by his own admission a heavily drinking, lazy, manipulative man who's climb to the top of the capitialist world is linked only to his family ties and not any hard work on his part. What a low life bum! Yet he's held up as some sort of respectful version of a family man when he couldn't stand up to Malcolm's spit when it comes to looking at the characteristics of trustworthiness, integrity, honesty, and sincerity. Malcolm didn't even sign his house into his name because he was committed to the movement to a fault. This type of selfless feature would never be something that could ever be confused with self serving and dishonest weakneed people like Bush senior, junior, Bill Clinton, or even Obama. Some of you may be surprised by the inclusion of Obama with the other creepy individuals, but he belongs there. He's a much nicer and smoother version, but the end result remains the same. Now let's address that contradiction why don't we....And the comment section is turned on here so anyone can click on where it indicates there is a comment and you can read what is being written. Let those who want to share honest input proceed and please....Let the idiots expose themselves for all to see!!!
RSS Feed