Ahjamu Umi's: "The Truth Challenge"
  • Home
  • Workshops
  • New Manifesto
  • Hit Me Up
  • Blog
  • Coming Events
  • Videos
  • Donations

"Who Killed Malcolm X" Attempts to Murder His Revolutionary Life

2/16/2020

3 Comments

 
Picture
Malcolm X and Kwame Nkrumah in Harlem, NY, in 1960. Nkrumah's revolutionary Pan-African government was overthrown within a year and three days of Malcolm's assassination, but these revisionist scholars and their supporters, would have you believe all of this, and much more, is unrelated and a coincidence

Netflix recently released the above titled docu-series.  The six episode series details the efforts by an African named Abdul Rahman Muhammad to fulfill his ambition of finding out who was behind the February 21, 1965 assassination of El Hajj Malik Shabazz – Malcolm X.  Although the series does its best to suggest that no one has ever had the determination to match Muhammad’s focus on getting to the bottom of this crime, the reality is that plenty of people have explored this question before Muhammad’s docu-series.  There have been a number of books that have been written on this topic.  George Brietman released “The Assassination of Malcolm X” in 1967.  I first read this book in 1979.  In 1992, Karl Evanzz released “The Judas Factor; The Plot to Kill Malcolm X.”  There are many, many others.  And most of them, most notably Brietman and Evanzz’s works, go much deeper with much more critical analysis than Muhammad’s docu-series. 

The fact that books on the topic of who assassinated Malcolm and why have been churned out for the last 50+ years makes it that much easier to shake my head at “Who Killed Malcolm X.”  This is my response because I know the very troublesome lack of intellectual honesty that exists today.  I know that most people haven’t read one authoritative book on anything, not to mention Malcolm X’s assassination.  I know that most people suffer from intellectual laziness and will always choose to have someone else do their work for them instead of engaging in serious study themselves.  I know that most people will rely on Muhammad’s mediocre work instead of seriously investigating this question.  And, I know that Netflix as a multi-media propaganda mechanism for the capitalist system, will rely on all of the issues I’ve indicated here to do what capitalism always does; shape in a very subtle way our liberation movements and figures to fit neatly into capitalism’s desired manifestation of who and what those people and movements represent(ed).  And, armed only with what our enemies have provided us, most people will passionately argue Netflix’s position on who killed Malcolm X which, if it wasn’t so surreal and pitiful, would be hilarious. 

There were countless issues with the docu-series so I’ll try to recount the most glaring ones here.  First, Muhammad focuses a lot of his presentation on the innocence of Muhammad Aziz, formally Norman 3X Butler, and Khalil Islam, formally Thomas 15X Johnson.  Both men were convicted, along with Talmadge Hayer, or Thomas Hagan, for assassinating Malcolm X.  Hayer was the only admitted assassin convicted (and he was only captured because the crowd at the Audobon Ballroom grabbed him and beat him relentlessly until police arrived and rescued him).  Aziz and Islam each served 20+ years for the conviction.  Anyone with even cursory knowledge of the assassination knows that Aziz and Islam had nothing to do with killing Malcolm X, but casual observers of this history should understand clearly that to most of us who have closely studied this for decades, the portrayal of Aziz and Islam as innocent victims in all of this is deeply offensive.  As even Muhammad states himself multiple times during his production, Aziz and Islam were well known New York “enforcers” within the Fruit of Islam, the para-military wing of the Nation of Islam.  There is no confusion what is meant by the term “enforcer.”  These were guys who beat and intimidated people who did not conduct themselves in ways favorable to Nation of Islam leadership.  These two guys in particular were involved in multiple incidents of intimidation aimed at Malcolm during the final months of his involvement with the Nation of Islam and certainly during the 11 months between his departure from the Nation and his assassination.  The fact Aziz and Islam (the latter who died in 2009) played these nefarious roles within the Nation of Islam is what made it so easy for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the New York Prosecutor’s office to accuse and convict them.  Muhammad expresses dismay that no one spoke up on behalf of Aziz and Islam, despite common knowledge that those two were innocent of Malcolm’s assassination.  Most likely, people didn’t speak up because people knew that those two may have been innocent regarding Malcolm’s death, but they were certainly guilty of plenty of other crimes against people in the community. 

Secondly, Muhammad’s tiptoeing around the disgraceful character known as John Ali, the former National Secretary of the Nation of Islam under Elijah Muhammad, is criminal in its neglect.  There are ample documents, most notably from files recovered in the 1974 Freedom of Information Act, that demonstrate that Ali was one of multiple highly placed FBI informants within the Nation of Islam from 1957 forward.  Accompanying documentation of his increased bank accounts during that period, despite no known source of income besides his modest salary within the Nation of Islam, along with other sources of documentation, make a very compelling argument against Ali in this regard.  Regardless, Muhammad resorts to only asking Ali politely about this and responding with nothing when Ali responds with a silly and garbled Biblical comparison.  This is significant because the actual evidence strongly suggests that much of the internal dissension within the Nation that helped lead to the environment of Malcolm’s assassination was widely instigated by Ali who played a critical role in cutting off Malcolm’s access to Elijah Muhammad while feeding Elijah Muhammad dishonest and wedge strengthening information about the work Malcolm was doing. 

Third, Muhammad does mention the position of the defenders of Elijah Muhammad during this period (and up to the present day) repeating over and over that Elijah Muhammad said publicly that Malcolm was not to be harmed by anyone in the Nation of Islam, but we know that as Sekou Ture taught us, “based solely on what comes from our lips, we are all equal.”  Even despite the weak overall analysis of his docu-series, even Muhammad is clear enough to realize that there is absolutely no way Elijah Muhammad Jr., the son of Elijah Muhammad, would be brazen enough to tell 400 Fruit of Islam soldiers in the Armory building in 1964 to “cut out the n - - - - r’s tongue and send it Chicago and I’ll stamp it approved!” unless he was pretty comfortable that what he was doing wasn’t in direct violation of Elijah Muhammad’s orders. 

Finally, the most egregious violation of this docu-series is its flippant treatment of the federal government’s role in orchestrating Malcolm’s assassination.  Muhammad mentions this at different points, but his production never seriously centers the role of this government in precipitating the assassination and its impossible for me to consider this a pure accident.  Our ideological training has taught us, as Kwame Ture was fond of saying, that “any analysis of our people’s suffering that doesn’t include our enemies is incomplete!”  The FBI’s own files provide more than enough evidence to substantiate the role the FBI and local police played in the days leading up to the assassination and immediately afterward.  Also, Muhammad’s neglect in mentioning the fact Malcolm was denied entry into Frances days before his assassination (presumably because the French government, being aware of the U.S. government’s intentions of having Malcolm assassinated, didn’t want it to happen in their country), and that Malcolm was unquestionably poisoned (by expert medical opinion) in Cario, Egypt, days before his assassination is curious at best and criminally amateur at worse.  He didn’t mention either of these incidents because neither fits neatly into the Nation of Islam assassinated Malcolm X scenario since the Nation has no capacity to have carried out either incident.  Also, you can never forget that the primary objective of Netflix is never to provide revolutionary education to the masses of African people and humanity.  Their primary objective is always to produce content that will generate a large viewership for the purpose of profit and they will produce and air anything that will generate such an audience.  And, they will air it anyway that fits them regardless of its accuracy.
​
We already certain we know how some of you are going to react to this piece.  There are those of us who still (amazingly) wish to subscribe to a classless analysis of our people and what we produce, wanting to believe that anything “Black” (whatever that means) should be universally supported by African people everywhere and anything short of that is treason against our people.  We completely and unilaterally reject that unscientific position.  People operate with all sorts of capitalist inspired, money making agendas that have absolutely nothing to do with our people’s liberation, despite their ability to fool most of us who understand our movements only on a Hollywood surface level.  We also should point out that there are those among us who will go down to the bitter end depending our right to be as ignorant as we want to be while refusing to be honest enough to acknowledge that there are people out here who, while you spent all your time partying, playing with your shoelaces, or whatever you have spent your life doing, have been studying and working around questions like who really killed Malcolm.  In other words, inspite of the illusion of social media, there are many people who know much more about this than you do.  Despite this clear contradiction, we recognize some of us will die before we acknowledge this, choosing instead to maintain our superficial understanding of these critical questions that are reinforced by production’s like Muhammad’s.  For you folks, we are impressed that you have even read this far because this piece really isn’t for you.  Its for the masses of serious students of history who understand that Malcolm was a burgeoning revolutionary Pan-Africanist.  For those of you who know that Malcolm may have said or written whatever to try and appease Elijah Muhammad, but that he truly didn’t want back into the Nation of Islam (no more than you really want to hold onto that toxic relationship in your life that you do some much to maintain).  Serious people know that Malcolm’s comments about John F. Kennedy’s assassination at the Manhattan Center (where John Ali orchestrated complete sabotage against Malcolm in a clearly coordinated way) on December 1, 1963, clearly indicate his political outgrowth beyond anything the Nation of Islam was capable of talking about.  Malcolm’s analysis, which Muhammad glosses over in this work, was as clear a denunciation of imperialism’s criminal role (it continues to play) in Africa and around the world, using the Congo and the U.S.’s leadership role in Patrice Lumumba’s assassination to preserve imperialism’s dominance in mineral rich Central Africa.  Malcolm’s leadership role in articulating these crimes against humanity and his strong organizational work to unite with revolutionary Pan-African forces in Africa working against these injustices, as well as his still unknown linking up with Cuba’s socialist revolutionaries.  These are clearly the reasons Malcolm was killed regardless of who uncle sam ended up getting to pull the trigger.  Malcolm’s assassination has to be seen in the political context that it occupies.  The murder of Lumumba.  The destabilization of the Congo.  The murder of Malcolm X.  The overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah’s government in 1966.  The overthrow of Keito’s government in Mali in 1968.  The Portuguese invasion of Guinea in 1970 (with its objective of overthrowing the Democratic Party of Guinea, assassinating Sekou Ture, Kwame Nkrumah, Amilcar Cabral, and destroying the African Party for the Independence of Guinea-Bissau).  The destabilization of revolutionary Pan-Africanism., etc.  The rolling out of neo-colonialism in Africa and the destabilizing of revolutionary organizing efforts.  All of this is for serious students only though.  Not anyone content to rely on Hollywood productions to pretend to understand true revolutionary African liberation history. 


3 Comments
Makheru Speaks link
2/16/2020 08:34:51 pm

Brother Ahjamu Umi raises some legitimate criticisms, however I agree with Malcolm X researcher Bro. Omar Shabazz who produced a critical review of the Netflix documentary and still encourages people to see it.

I don’t agree with the contention at Brother Abdur Rahman Muhammad’s research is mediocre. Much of the information he presented is not new to those of us who have been studying Baba Omowale for years, but it was detailed. How many of us have seen files indicating that the FBI knew of William X Bradley?

Regarding AR Muhammad, Bro Umi says, “his production never seriously centers the role of this government is precipitating the assassination.” The Netflix documentary was not Bro. Muhammad’s production. It was produced by Ark Media. We saw what they wanted us to see. We don’t know how much of Bro Muhammad’s information was left out of the final cut of the documentary.

The obvious objective of the sensationalizing Eurocentric media is to keep us fragmented and emotionally focused on personalities, while power structure institutions are doing the real damage. There is a critical need for Afrikan-centered holistic thinking and cerebral balance when dealing with this issue. I can’t completely dismiss Bro Muhammad’s work because the producers did what Eurocentric media does.

Malcolm X researcher Karl Evanzz has this to say about Thomas Johnson and Norman Butler: “Seven weeks earlier (prior the Malcolm’s assassination I presume), Johnson and Butler went to a local temple operated by a former member of the Nation of Islam and ordered him to remove a photo of their leader, Elijah Muhammad, from the window of his storefront location or suffer grave consequences.

When Benjamin Brown refused to remove the photo, Johnson asked him to step outside to discuss the matter. Once Brown did so, Johnson removed a .22 caliber rifle from underneath his coat and shot Brown. The first shot struck him in his left shoulder, and then the rifle jammed. ‘I was trying to shoot him in the chest,’ Johnson told me. Johnson, Butler, and other Muslims were quickly arrested. But for a stroke of good luck for Brown, they would have faced murder charges.”

The fact that Butler and Johnson were said to be FOI enforcers and had been arrested for a previous crime, does not make them guilty of killing Malcolm X, no matter how much they hated him at that time.

Bro Umi says: “You can never forget that the primary objective of Netflix is never to provide revolutionary education to the masses of African people and humanity.” Who expects Netflix to do this? That’s the responsibility of people struggling for the liberation and empowerment of Afrikan people. We have to produce our own programs if we want "revolutionary education" for the masses of Afrikan people.

Most people now get most of their information from various forms of media. This has in many ways contributed to a “dumbing down” of the body politic. This is where, what Dr. Bobby Wright called “the battle for the Black mind,” now takes place. We can either compete as best as we can or tap out.

Reply
Zenzele Bell
2/17/2020 01:27:42 pm

THANK YOU on all points. While some "already know" what really happened, there are also a whole lot of us who have no idea, and "it's been done before" is no justification for not putting out a documentary. Additionally, it's not as if the previous publications have been distributed to the masses who were born after 1965. Don't assume that, just because you wrote it, I read it, or even knew it existed, and I won't even go into the fact that a big reason Black revolutionary movements (at least in the US) failed, is because uber-conscious elders spent way too much time looking down their noses at anybody they didn't deem "conscious enough), instead of considering that nobody was born a freedom fighter - it's a process.

As soon as I found out the documentary was airing on Netflix (after being released several months ago on the soon-to-be-defunct Fusion TV), I knew what to expect, but I watched it anyway, because there was still a lot of information I did not know, and as a former NOI kid who was born three years after Bro. Malcolm was assassinated, I knew quite a bit.

Lastly, "We have to produce our own programs if we want 'revolutionary education for the masses of Afrikan people" is ALWAYS the right response. And if one of us takes up the reins and produces a project somebody still believes to be inefficient, show and prove that you can do better. This isn't even a competition - we're all supposed to be in it for all African people, right? Then show and prove.

Peace.

Reply
AD
2/17/2020 02:17:34 pm

this was heat. ^^^^^




Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    I don't see disagreement as a negative because I understand that Frederick Douglass was correct when he said "there is no progress without struggle."  Our brains are muscles.  Just like any other muscle in our body if we don't stress it and push it, the brain will not improve.  Or, as a bumper sticker I saw once put it, "If you can't change your mind, how do you know it's there?"

    Archives

    June 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly